[sg-ops] [sg-hub] Survey on Global IPv6 Penetration 2014

[LIM Fung]

HI Chun Sing,

AFAIK, CGN works the same way as NAT on a CPE - it's just another layer
of NAT so applications that work over the CPE should just work over CGN.

Now, although operators may choose to go dual stack, subscribers will
still need a way to reach IPv4 sites so while they may have global IPv6
connectivity, NAT44 may still be needed just to allow these users to
reach global IPv4 destinations (and they have to deploy RFC1918 range
for their subscribers since they cannot get hold of enough public
address blocks). The other way of doing it is to perform NAT64, but not
all applications work nicely over NAT64.

HTH :)

regards,
Lim Fung

On 25/07/2013 10:42, Kerk Chun Sing wrote:
>
> In SG, one of the new ISP choose to do CGN in their network. Maybe it
> is due to lack of operational v6 experience or concern about the
> volume of clueless users flooding their support line on day 1 of their
> business.
>
> VPN and Skype works on CGN, anyone know what application will break?
>
> /chunsing
>
> ? 2013-7-24 PM4:22,"Tom Paseka" <tom at cloudflare.com
> <mailto:tom at cloudflare.com>> ??:
>
>     Hi All
>
>     On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Kerk Chun Sing
>     <chunsing.kerk at sgix.sg <mailto:chunsing.kerk at sgix.sg>> wrote:
>
>         Personally, with IP trading and recycling of v4 addresses, I
>         felt that IPv6 adoption in Singapore will stay low for the
>         years to come.
>
>         Anyhow, do help APNIC to complete the survey if you have the time.
>
>
>     Don't just do the APNIC Survey, deploy IPv6 too!  =)
>
>     -Tom
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sghub mailing list
> Sghub at list.sgnog.net
> http://list.sgnog.net/listinfo/sghub

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.sgnog.net/pipermail/sgops/attachments/20130725/5eaee9f1/attachment.html>